Natural Number
The counting numbers (1, 2, 3, …) — the oldest mathematical objects in human history, independently invented by every known civilisation.
| Type | Concept |
|---|---|
| Domain | 02 — Number Systems & Number Theory |
| Symbol | ℕ (from the German Natürliche Zahlen) |
| MSC2020 | 11-XX (Number Theory); 03Exx (Set theory — for the formal construction) |
| Also known as | counting number, positive integer (when 0 excluded), whole number (informal) |
| Contested | Whether 0 is a natural number — see definition section |
| Confidence | High — see provenance |
| Last reviewed | |
| JSON | number-theory/natural-number/index.json |
Definition
A natural number is a member of the set ℕ of non-negative (or positive) integers used in counting and ordering. The natural numbers are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, … (or 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, … in conventions that include zero — see note). They form the most primitive and universal number system in mathematics, independently developed by every known human civilisation. Formally, the natural numbers are characterised by Peano's axioms (Giuseppe Peano, 1889): there is a first natural number, every natural number has a unique successor, and there is no natural number whose successor is the first — together with the principle of mathematical induction. In ZFC set theory, the natural numbers are constructed from the empty set: 0 = ∅, 1 = {∅}, 2 = {∅, {∅}}, and so on (the von Neumann ordinal construction).
This is a genuine ongoing convention disagreement. The ISO 80000-2 standard (International Organization for Standardization, 2019) defines ℕ = {0, 1, 2, 3, …}, including zero. The tradition in number theory often excludes zero, writing ℕ = {1, 2, 3, …} and ℕ₀ for the set including zero. Both conventions are used in authoritative mathematical literature. This codex follows the ISO 80000-2 standard (ℕ includes 0) and explicitly notes where a source uses the exclusive convention.
Curious — No background needed
Humans were counting before we had language for it. The Lebombo bone — a piece of baboon fibula found in the Lebombo Mountains of Eswatini (formerly Swaziland) — is carved with 29 notches and has been dated to approximately 43,000 years ago. The Ishango bone, found near the Congo-Uganda border, is about 20,000 years old and shows tally marks in patterns that some researchers believe represent prime numbers or a lunar calendar. Neither civilisation left written language. But they left numbers.
The natural numbers — 1, 2, 3, 4, and on forever — are not just the first numbers humans learned. They are the first numbers mathematics itself learned to define. Every known human civilisation developed counting systems independently: the Sumerians in base 60, the Maya in base 20, the ancient Egyptians in a decimal system remarkably similar to our own, the Vedic Indians with number words in Sanskrit that are still recognisable in European languages today (the Sanskrit nava means nine; so does the Latin novem and the English "nine").
For thousands of years, "the natural numbers" meant simply "the numbers you count with." Then, in 1889, an Italian mathematician named Giuseppe Peano wrote down five axioms — five rules — that described exactly what makes something a natural number. The key insight: you do not need to know what a natural number is. You only need to know the rules the natural numbers satisfy. This was the birth of modern formal mathematics.
And there is a question that took mathematicians a long time to settle: is zero a natural number? The ancient Indians had zero. The Maya had it independently. But "zero things" is not a counting number in the same intuitive sense as "one thing" or "two things." Today, the international ISO standard includes zero in the natural numbers. Many number theorists prefer to exclude it. Both conventions appear in published mathematics, and this codex notes which convention a source is using.
The natural numbers have two fundamental properties that seem obvious but require proof: there are infinitely many of them (no largest natural number exists), and there are infinitely many prime numbers among them (Euclid proved this around 300 BCE — the proof is still considered one of the most beautiful in mathematics). These facts, obvious in hindsight, took humanity thousands of years of mathematical development to establish with certainty.
Exploring — Practical detail
Peano's axioms
Peano's 1889 axiomatisation of the natural numbers (in Arithmetices principia, nova methodo exposita) uses a first element, a successor function S, and mathematical induction. In modern formulation (Peano Arithmetic, PA):
- 0 is a natural number.
- For every natural number n, S(n) — the successor of n — is a natural number.
- 0 is not the successor of any natural number: S(n) ≠ 0 for all n.
- The successor function is injective: if S(m) = S(n) then m = n.
- Induction: if a property holds for 0, and whenever it holds for n it holds for S(n), then it holds for all natural numbers.
From these axioms, all arithmetic (addition, multiplication, ordering) can be defined. Addition is defined recursively: a + 0 = a and a + S(n) = S(a + n). Multiplication: a × 0 = 0 and a × S(n) = (a × n) + a.
Multi-civilisational development
Every known human civilisation developed counting systems. The notable systems and their distinctive features:
- Babylonian (c. 2000 BCE): Sexagesimal (base 60) system. Positional notation. No zero as a position-holder initially; later a placeholder symbol appeared but not zero as a number (Robson, E., Mathematics in Ancient Iraq, Princeton, 2008).
- Egyptian (c. 3100 BCE): Additive decimal system recorded in the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus (c. 1550 BCE, in the British Museum). Hieroglyphic symbols for powers of 10.
- Indian (Vedic era, c. 1500–500 BCE): Sanskrit number words with decimal structure that influenced Greek, Latin, and ultimately all European languages. The Vedic number system extended to enormous numbers — names for 10^53 appear in ancient texts.
- Chinese (c. 1600 BCE): Decimal system with rod numerals. The Jiuzhang Suanshu (Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art, c. 200 BCE) uses a sophisticated arithmetic including negative numbers.
- Maya (c. 350 CE, possibly earlier): Vigesimal (base 20) positional system with an independent invention of zero — one of only three known independent inventions of positional notation with zero.
Properties of natural numbers
Under addition and multiplication, ℕ forms a commutative semiring: addition is associative and commutative, multiplication is associative and commutative, multiplication distributes over addition, and 0 is the additive identity and 1 is the multiplicative identity. It is not a ring (no additive inverses — negative numbers are not natural numbers).
The successor model and infinity
The fifth Peano axiom (induction) is what distinguishes ℕ from other structures satisfying the first four axioms. Without it, "non-standard models" of arithmetic exist — structures satisfying Peano axioms 1–4 that contain infinite elements. Gödel's incompleteness theorems (1931) showed that no finite set of axioms can completely characterise the natural numbers — there will always be true statements about ℕ that are not provable in any fixed axiom system.
Deep Dive — Formal and citable
Von Neumann ordinal construction in ZFC
In ZFC set theory, the natural numbers are defined as the finite von Neumann ordinals. Define: 0 = ∅, and for each ordinal n, define S(n) = n ∪ {n}. Thus 1 = {∅}, 2 = {∅, {∅}}, 3 = {∅, {∅}, {∅, {∅}}}, and so on. The Axiom of Infinity guarantees that the set ω = {0, 1, 2, 3, …} exists. In this construction, the natural number n is literally a set with exactly n elements: n = {0, 1, …, n−1}. Membership (∈) in this context corresponds to the strict less-than ordering: m < n iff m ∈ n.
Peano Arithmetic and incompleteness
Peano Arithmetic (PA) is the first-order theory with constant 0, successor function S, addition +, and multiplication ×, satisfying the Peano axioms stated in first-order logic (with the induction schema rather than second-order induction). By Gödel's first incompleteness theorem (1931), PA is incomplete: there exist statements in the language of PA that are true in the standard model ℕ but not provable in PA. The Paris-Harrington theorem (1977) gives a combinatorial example of a true statement about natural numbers that is not provable in PA, though it is provable in stronger systems. (Paris, J. and Harrington, L., "A Mathematical Incompleteness in Peano Arithmetic," in Barwise, J. (ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Logic, North-Holland, 1977.)
Why there are infinitely many primes (Euclid's proof, c. 300 BCE)
Suppose there were only finitely many primes: p₁, p₂, …, pₙ. Construct N = (p₁ × p₂ × … × pₙ) + 1. N is either prime (a new prime not in the list) or has a prime factor. But any prime factor of N cannot be any pᵢ — because N divided by any pᵢ leaves remainder 1. So N has a prime factor not in the list. Either way, the list is incomplete. Contradiction. Therefore no finite list of all primes can exist.
This proof is in Book IX, Proposition 20 of Euclid's Elements (c. 300 BCE), in the Heath translation: "The prime numbers are more than any assigned multitude of prime numbers" (Heath, T.L., The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements, Cambridge University Press, 1908, vol. 2, p. 412).
Ordinal and cardinal aspects
Natural numbers serve two distinct roles. As cardinals, they count the size of finite sets: the set {a, b, c} has cardinality 3. As ordinals, they describe position in a sequence: "the third element." For finite numbers, these roles coincide. They diverge at infinity: ω (the first infinite ordinal) and ℵ₀ (the first infinite cardinal) are different objects with different arithmetic, though they are both "the size of the natural numbers" in different senses.
Formal statement of Peano axioms (second-order)
The second-order Peano axioms categorically characterise ℕ (up to isomorphism). Let 0 be a constant, S a unary function. The axioms state: (1) S(n) ≠ 0 for all n; (2) S is injective; (3) for any set X, if 0 ∈ X and whenever n ∈ X then S(n) ∈ X, then X = ℕ. The categoricity result — that any two models of these axioms are isomorphic — was established by Dedekind in 1888 in Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? ("What are Numbers and What Should They Be?", Brunswick, 1888).
Relationships
Prerequisites
- Set — In ZFC, the natural numbers are constructed from sets; the concept of set is the logical prerequisite for the formal construction of ℕ via von Neumann ordinals.
Consequences
- Integer — The integers are constructed by extending the natural numbers to include additive inverses, producing the ring ℤ = {…, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, …}.
- Prime Number — Prime numbers are defined as natural numbers greater than 1 with no divisors other than 1 and themselves — a definition that requires the natural numbers.
- Series — An infinite series is a sum indexed by the natural numbers; the concept of natural number is the indexing structure for all of analysis.
- Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems — Gödel's theorems are specifically about formal systems strong enough to describe the natural numbers — ℕ is the subject matter whose arithmetic cannot be completely axiomatised.
Historical lineage
- Aryabhatiya (499 CE) — The Aryabhatiya contains one of the earliest explicit place-value treatments of natural numbers, with the positional decimal system that eventually became universal worldwide.
Canonical sources
-
Tier 1
Arithmetices principia, nova methodo exposita (The Principles of Arithmetic, Presented by a New Method).
Turin: Fratelli Bocca, 1889.
The foundational text introducing Peano's axioms for the natural numbers. Primary source for all claims about the axiomatic characterisation of ℕ. -
Tier 1
Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? (What are Numbers and What Should They Be?).
Brunswick: Vieweg, 1888.
Dedekind's foundational analysis of the natural numbers, proving the categoricity of the second-order axiomatisation. Published the year before Peano's work. -
Tier 1
ISO 80000-2: Quantities and Units — Part 2: Mathematics.
Geneva: ISO, 2019.
The authoritative international standard for mathematical notation. Defines ℕ = {0, 1, 2, 3, …} (including zero). Primary source for the convention adopted in this codex. -
Tier 2
"Natural numbers." mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/HistTopics/Natural_numbers/
Accessed 2026-05-27.
Used for historical attribution and context. Secondary source only — all factual claims corroborated with Tier 1 sources. -
Tier 1
"Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Blombos Cave: evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age."
Journal of Human Evolution, vol. 48(1), pp. 3–24. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.09.002
Peer-reviewed source establishing early evidence of counting behaviour. The Lebombo and Ishango bone contexts come from this and related paleoanthropological literature.
Provenance
- Author
- The Codex (Let Us Do It For U), Mumbai
- Reviewer
- Not yet reviewed by external expert — see build status
- Created
- Last reviewed
- — Session 1 initial build
- Confidence
- High — Peano's axioms sourced from the 1889 primary text (Tier 1). ISO 80000-2 convention sourced from the ISO standard (Tier 1). Multi-civilisational history sourced from peer-reviewed paleoanthropological and historical mathematics literature.
- Build status
- Complete (Session 1 proof-of-concept)
- Cite as
- "Natural Number", Mathematics Codex, https://thecodex.expert/mathematics/number-theory/natural-number/, last updated .