Documents knowledge from named institutional sources. Not advice. Full disclaimer →

Last verified:
Concept · Climate technology · Deployment gap

Carbon Capture and Storage

CCS captures CO₂ from industrial sources and injects it permanently underground. The IEA requires 7.6 Gtonne/year by 2050 but only 45 MT is captured today — a 170× gap. Named projects: Sleipner Norway (1996, first ever), Climeworks Mammoth Iceland (36,000 t/yr, world's largest DAC). India's position explained.

Definition

What is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)?

CCS is a technology that captures CO₂ emissions from industrial sources or the atmosphere, compresses them, and injects them permanently underground. It is a critical but underdeployed climate technology: the IEA NZE 2050 scenario requires 7.6 Gtonne/year of CO₂ captured by 2050 — versus approximately 45 million tonnes captured globally in 2023. The gap is enormous.

45 MT
CO₂ captured globally 2023
7,600 MT
Required by 2050 (IEA NZE)
$50–100
Cost per tonne CO₂ captured (industrial)
$200–400
Cost per tonne (direct air capture)
How CCS works:
(1) Capture: CO₂ is separated from flue gas (post-combustion capture) or from hydrogen/fuel gas streams (pre-combustion capture) using chemical solvents (MEA — monoethanolamine), physical solvents, solid sorbents, or membranes. (2) Compression: CO₂ is compressed to supercritical state (~100 bar) — a dense fluid that is easier to transport and inject. (3) Transport: Via pipeline or ship to the storage site. (4) Injection: Pumped into geological formations — depleted oil/gas reservoirs, saline aquifers, basalt formations — at depths of 1,000–3,000m where pressure and temperature keep CO₂ in supercritical state permanently.
Named CCS projects with GPS:
Sleipner (Norway) — 58.37°N 1.85°E — world's first offshore CCS, operating since . Statoil/Equinor injects ~1 MT/year CO₂ into the Utsira sandstone formation under the North Sea. Quest (Canada) — 57.36°N 112.04°W — Shell, captures 1 MT/year from oil sands upgrader in Alberta. Boundary Dam (Canada) — 49.24°N 103.04°W — SaskPower, world's first CCS on a coal power plant. Illinois Industrial CCS — 40.07°N 88.37°W — ADM, ethanol plant, 1 MT/year. Northern Lights (Norway) — 60.52°N 5.02°E — Equinor+Shell+TotalEnergies, offshore CO₂ terminal, operational .
Direct Air Capture

Direct Air Capture (DAC) — pulling CO₂ from ambient air

DAC captures CO₂ directly from ambient air (approximately 420 ppm CO₂) — not from concentrated industrial flue gas. Because air is only 0.042% CO₂ (vs 10–15% in flue gas), DAC requires approximately 100× more energy and is 3–5× more expensive per tonne. But DAC can be deployed anywhere, enabling removal of historical emissions. Named plants: Orca Iceland (64.00°N 21.00°W, 4,000 tonnes/yr, Climeworks — world's first commercial DAC, opened 2021), Mammoth Iceland (64.08°N 22.69°W, 36,000 tonnes/yr, Climeworks, opened 2024 — world's largest), Stratos Texas (31.50°N 103.50°W, 500,000 tonnes/yr target, Occidental 1PointFive, operational 2024 — world's largest in USA). Current DAC cost: ~$300–1,000/tonne. Target with scale: $100–150/tonne by 2035. Source: IEA CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions 2024.

India and CCS

India's CCS position

India has significant CO₂ storage potential (Department of Science and Technology estimates approximately 572 Gt in geological formations) but essentially no CCS deployment as of 2024. India's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) does not include CCS as a tool — India views CCS as expensive technology that rich nations should deploy. The cost of CCS ($50–100/tonne) is economically prohibitive for Indian industry where energy margins are thin. India is more focused on green hydrogen and fuel switching than CCS for industrial decarbonisation. Source: NITI Aayog Energy Outlook 2023 · DST India geological storage assessment.

Questions

Questions about CCS

Why is CCS deployment so far behind climate scenario targets?
The IEA NZE 2050 scenario requires approximately 7.6 Gtonne/year of CO₂ captured by 2050 — but current deployment is approximately 45 million tonnes/year (2023), approximately 170× below the required level. The barriers are structural: (1) Cost: Industrial CCS costs $50–100/tonne. Carbon prices in most markets are below this level — there is no market incentive without policy support. The EU ETS carbon price reached approximately €95/tonne in 2023 — making CCS marginally economic for some industries in Europe. (2) Infrastructure: CCS requires CO₂ pipelines and storage sites that must be built before industrial emitters can connect — a chicken-and-egg problem. (3) Opposition: Environmental groups argue CCS extends fossil fuel use; fossil fuel interests argue it is too expensive. Political support is inconsistent. (4) Timeline: Every large CCS project takes 10–15 years from decision to operation. Projects decided today won't operate until 2035–2040. The window is narrowing. Source: IEA CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions 2024 · Global CCS Institute Status Report 2023.
Provenance

Attribution and citation

Sources
IEA CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions 2024 · Global CCS Institute Status Report 2023 · Climeworks · Equinor Northern Lights · DST India geological storage
Cite as
"Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) — The Energy Codex", The Energy Codex, https://thecodex.expert/energy/ccs/, last updated .