What is Maker (MKR) and DAI?
๐ New to this? Just start reading at the top โ it begins in plain English and gets more detailed as you scroll. Jump to any level:
๐ข The simple version
Plain English โ no jargon. Start here.
MakerDAO is the project behind DAI, one of the most trusted stablecoins in crypto โ and it's run entirely by its token holders, not a company.
The project behind a stablecoin
You may already know DAI, a stablecoin designed to always be worth about one US dollar. MakerDAO is the project that creates and manages it โ except there's no CEO or company office. Instead, it's a "DAO" (decentralised autonomous organisation), run by people who hold its governance token, MKR, voting on how the system should work.
How the system stays stable
DAI isn't backed by a pile of dollars in a bank. Instead, people lock up other crypto (like Ethereum) as collateral, and DAI is created against that collateral โ always keeping more value locked up than DAI issued, so the system stays solvent even if the collateral's price wobbles. MKR holders vote on the technical settings that keep this balance safe, essentially acting as the system's risk managers.
What MKR actually does
Holding MKR gives you a voice in how the whole system is run โ which types of collateral to accept, what fees to charge, how to respond if something goes wrong. It's less a "coin you spend" and more a stake in the governance of a financial system, similar in spirit to owning shares with voting rights, though without the same legal protections shares carry.
What to keep in mind
MakerDAO is one of the oldest, most battle-tested projects in DeFi, and DAI's track record is a big reason it's trusted. But governance-by-vote can be slow, and the system's safety still depends on collateral prices behaving reasonably โ a severe market crash is the main risk scenario. MKR is more volatile and niche than DAI itself; understand what you're buying before you do.
๐ก A bit more detail
For when you want to go a little deeper.
The governance token and the move to Sky
Maker's system is governed by holders of its governance token, historically called MKR. MKR holders vote on the critical decisions that keep the system running and safe — what assets can be used as collateral, the parameters governing how DAI is created and maintained, fees, and risk management. This makes MKR holders the stewards of a major financial system, with real responsibility for its safety and direction. MKR also plays a role in the system's safety mechanism: in certain scenarios where the system faces shortfalls, MKR can be created and sold to recapitalise it, meaning MKR holders bear some of the ultimate risk and are thus incentivised to govern prudently. Notably, Maker has undergone a significant rebranding and evolution into "Sky," introducing changes including new tokens and branding as part of a broader transformation of the project, an evolution of the original MakerDAO into a new phase.
How DAI stays at $1
DAI's stability comes from several interacting mechanisms worth understanding. The foundation is overcollateralisation — DAI is always backed by more collateral value than the DAI in circulation, providing a safety cushion. When DAI drifts from $1, economic incentives and mechanisms push it back: parameters like the fees charged for creating DAI can be adjusted to influence supply and demand, and the liquidation system ensures undercollateralised positions are resolved. Over time, Maker also incorporated mechanisms allowing DAI to be created against other stablecoins and assets, and a feature offering savings yield on DAI, all of which help manage its stability and adoption. The combination of overcollateralisation, adjustable parameters, liquidations, and these additional mechanisms works to keep DAI reliably near $1, maintaining the peg through a sophisticated system of incentives and safeguards rather than through a company's promise.
Maker and DAI, while foundational and battle-tested, carry genuine risks. There is smart-contract risk — the possibility of bugs or exploits in the complex system of contracts. There is collateral risk — if the crypto backing DAI crashes in value very rapidly, the liquidation system could struggle to keep up, potentially leaving the system undercollateralised (Maker faced severe stress during a major market crash early in its history, which tested and informed its mechanisms). There is the risk introduced by the types of collateral accepted — as Maker expanded to back DAI with various assets including other stablecoins and real-world assets, it took on the risks of those assets. And maintaining a stablecoin's peg is an ongoing challenge. While Maker is among the most proven and carefully-governed DeFi systems, these risks are real and inherent to a decentralised, collateral-backed stablecoin. Live data: CoinGecko
Maker among stablecoins and DeFi
Maker, through DAI, is one of the leading stablecoin systems and a cornerstone of DeFi. DAI competes with centralised stablecoins like USDC and USDT (which are larger but centralised), other decentralised stablecoins, and newer entrants like Ethena's synthetic dollar. Maker's distinguishing characteristic is that DAI is one of the most established, trusted, and genuinely decentralised stablecoins, governed by a community rather than a company, with a long track record of maintaining its value through various market conditions. Its position as foundational, battle-tested infrastructure providing decentralised stable value is a significant strength. Maker was a pioneer that proved decentralised stablecoins could work, and its evolution into Sky represents an effort to grow and adapt the system further, maintaining its important role in providing the decentralised stable value that much of DeFi relies upon.
๐ฃ The full technical picture
For the technically curious.
The vault mechanism and DAI creation
The core technical mechanism of Maker is the system through which users create DAI by locking collateral, historically organised around what were called collateralised debt positions or "vaults." A user deposits crypto collateral into a vault and can then generate DAI against it, up to a limit determined by the collateral's value and the required overcollateralisation ratio for that asset. The user has effectively taken a loan in DAI against their locked collateral, and they pay a fee (a "stability fee") for doing so. To retrieve their collateral, they repay the DAI plus the fee. If the collateral's value falls such that the position becomes insufficiently collateralised, the vault is liquidated — the collateral is sold to cover the DAI that was created plus a penalty, protecting the system's solvency. This vault mechanism is the engine of DAI creation: DAI comes into existence when people borrow it against collateral and is destroyed when they repay, with the overcollateralisation and liquidation system ensuring that every DAI in circulation is always backed by more than its value in collateral, which is the foundation of DAI's stability and the system's solvency.
Liquidations, the safety mechanism, and system solvency
Maintaining solvency is paramount for Maker, and its liquidation and safety systems are central to this. When a vault becomes undercollateralised, it must be liquidated promptly — the collateral auctioned or sold to cover the DAI debt before the position's value falls below what it backs. This relies on liquidators (often automated) acting on undercollateralised positions and on sufficient market liquidity to sell the collateral. The danger, as with all such systems, is a rapid market crash where many positions need liquidating simultaneously, collateral values are plunging, and liquidity is scarce — a scenario that severely stressed Maker during a major crash early in its history, an episode that tested the system and led to refinements. As an ultimate backstop, Maker's design allows for the governance token to be created and sold to recapitalise the system if liquidations fail to cover the debt and the system faces a shortfall, meaning token holders bear the final risk. This layered approach — overcollateralisation, liquidations, and the token backstop — is designed to keep the system solvent and DAI fully backed even under stress, though extreme conditions remain the greatest test of any such system.
The evolution of collateral and the real-world asset question
Maker's approach to what backs DAI has evolved significantly, raising important considerations. Originally DAI was backed primarily by ETH and similar crypto. Over time, Maker expanded to accept a wide variety of collateral, including other stablecoins (which raised the question of how decentralised DAI truly is if substantially backed by centralised stablecoins like USDC) and, notably, "real-world assets" — bringing off-chain assets like bonds and credit into the system as backing for DAI. This expansion served important purposes: it could improve DAI's stability, generate revenue for the system, and allow DAI to scale beyond what purely crypto collateral might support. But it also introduced new risks and complexities — dependence on centralised stablecoins reintroduces some of the centralisation DAI was meant to avoid, and real-world assets bring counterparty risk, legal complexity, and reliance on off-chain entities and processes. This evolution of collateral has been one of the most significant and debated aspects of Maker's development, reflecting a tension between purist decentralisation and the practical considerations of scaling and stabilising a major stablecoin, and it is central to understanding both how DAI works today and the risk and decentralisation tradeoffs the system has made.
The transformation into Sky and the project's future
Maker has undertaken a major transformation, rebranding and evolving into "Sky," which represents a significant new phase for the project. This evolution has involved new branding, changes to the token structure (introducing new tokens alongside or in place of the historical ones), and a broader vision for the project's future direction and growth. Such a transformation of one of DeFi's foundational and longest-running projects is significant, reflecting an ambition to grow, modernise, and expand the system beyond its original form. Evolutions of this scale carry both opportunity and complexity — they can revitalise and expand a project, but they also involve transitions that must be navigated carefully, including managing token changes, maintaining the stability and trust of DAI throughout, and executing a new vision. The transformation into Sky reflects the ongoing development of what began as MakerDAO into a new chapter, and its success depends on executing this evolution while preserving the core value — a trusted, decentralised stablecoin system — that made Maker foundational to DeFi in the first place, with the changes aiming to position the project for continued relevance and growth in an evolving landscape.
Honest assessment of the risks
Maker is genuinely foundational and one of the most important, pioneering, and battle-tested projects in decentralised finance — it created DAI, proved that a decentralised stablecoin could work, and built a system that has maintained stable value through years of varied market conditions, governed by a community rather than a company. But its risks are real and warrant careful attention. It carries smart-contract risk inherent to its complex system. It faces collateral risk — a rapid crash in the value of backing assets could stress the liquidation system, as a major crash did severely early in its history, potentially threatening solvency. Its evolution to accept diverse collateral, including centralised stablecoins and real-world assets, introduced new risks: dependence on centralised stablecoins reintroduces some centralisation, and real-world assets bring counterparty, legal, and off-chain risks, making DAI's backing more complex and less purely decentralised than originally. Maintaining the peg is an ongoing challenge, and the major transformation into Sky introduces transition complexity. While Maker is among the most proven and carefully-governed DeFi systems, with a strong track record that genuinely distinguishes it, these risks — smart-contract risk, collateral and liquidation risk in extreme conditions, the tradeoffs of its diverse collateral including real-world assets, and the complexity of its evolution — are real and deserve genuine consideration, even for a project as foundational and established as Maker.
Key protocol parameters
- Tokens: DAI (the decentralised stablecoin) + governance token (historically MKR; evolving via "Sky")
- Category: Decentralised stablecoin system — a DeFi cornerstone
- DAI: A ~$1 stablecoin backed by crypto collateral, not company-held dollars
- Core mechanism: Lock collateral in vaults, generate DAI against it (overcollateralised)
- Stability: Overcollateralisation + liquidations + adjustable fees + savings rate
- Governance: Token holders steward the system (collateral types, parameters, risk)
- Safety backstop: Governance token can be minted/sold to recapitalise in a shortfall
- Collateral evolution: Expanded to other stablecoins and real-world assets (with tradeoffs)
- Transformation: Rebranded/evolved into "Sky" — a major new phase
- Main rivals: USDC, USDT (centralised), other decentralised stablecoins, Ethena
- Key risk: smart-contract risk, collateral/liquidation risk in crashes, real-world-asset and centralised-collateral tradeoffs, transition complexity
- India tax: VDA — 30% on gains + 1% TDS; DAI also likely a VDA